SB Basketball @ BCS Tournament: Struggles and Triumphs

1/28/2025

Stanstead College entered the BCS Tournament with high hopes but faced stiff competition and a series of challenges over the course of the three games. Despite showing flashes of strong defensive play and offensive potential, their inability to maintain composure, coupled with turnovers and missed opportunities ultimately led to a difficult tournament showing. Here’s a breakdown of each game and what the team can take away from the experience.

Game 1: Stanstead College vs Selwyn House

Final Score: Stanstead College 33, Selwyn House 39

The tournament kicked off with a tightly contested game between two evenly matched teams. Both sides were aggressive on defense and exchanged baskets in a back-and-forth affair. After a 11-11 tie through the first 10 minutes, SC managed a slight 17-15 lead with five minutes remaining in the first half. Bo (7 points) and Jeremy (6 points, perfect 3-for-3 shooting) helped keep the team in it with short shots in the paint and a couple of offensive rebound putbacks.

However, Selwyn House closed the first half strong, finishing on a 9-0 run to take a 24-17 lead at halftime. In the second half, SC's defense tightened up significantly. The team made key adjustments, particularly on screens, and generated steals and deflections from Victor, Jeremy, and Josh. The defense held Selwyn to just 11 points in the second half, but two banked-in three-pointers proved costly, leaving SC with little room to catch up.

Highlights:

Jeremiah's massive blocked shot (though called a foul).
Bo led with 11 points and 8 rebounds.
Jeremy earned the Hardhat Award after posting 6 points, 6 rebounds, and 2 blocks.

Challenges:

Selwyn House out-hustled SC, capitalizing on turnovers and loose balls.
The absence of Augie made defensive rebounding difficult.
The team struggled with finishing at the rim and missed numerous open shots.

Game 2: Stanstead College vs Westwood

Final Score: Stanstead College 35, Westwood 46

SC came into the second game against Westwood with a lot of promise. Both teams played aggressively in the first half, and SC held a narrow 16-13 lead at halftime. Bo contributed 8 points in the first half, and the team’s transition game looked much better, with Luke and Daniel converting fast-break opportunities. SC’s defense from Game 1 carried over into the second half, as they opened the period with a 7-0 run.

However, the game took a turn for the worse. Up 31-24 with 10 minutes remaining, SC began to unravel. Westwood hit a few jumpers and capitalized on hustle plays, while SC’s defense and offense began to break down. Mental discipline faltered as the team got distracted by the referees, Westwood's physicality, and their own frustrations. Westwood responded with a 17-0 run, leaving SC no chance to recover as the game ended in a 46-35 loss.

Keys to the Game:

SC's mental discipline was the major issue. They couldn’t handle Westwood's aggressive play and physicality, losing focus in critical moments.
The team’s defense became disjointed, and the offense lost its rhythm.

Highlights:

Josh led the team with 9 points, 5 rebounds, and 2 steals, earning the Hardhat Award for his all-around performance.

Game 3: Stanstead College vs LCC

Final Score: Stanstead College 31, LCC 34

The final game of the tournament was a tale of two halves. SC's defense in the first half was impressive, forcing LCC into difficult outside shots that they consistently missed. Unfortunately, SC's offense didn’t capitalize, committing 22 turnovers and failing to run the offense effectively. Despite these mistakes, the defense kept SC in the game, limiting LCC to just 11 points in the first half.

In the second half, SC cleaned up their offensive play and briefly took a 17-13 lead. However, LCC went on a 12-0 run to take a 25-17 lead, and despite SC’s efforts to fight back, including a strong defensive push and a late surge led by Daniel and Josh, they couldn’t quite catch up. A potential game-tying shot by Bo rimmed out, and SC fell 34-31.

Highlights:

Daniel knocked down 4 key three-pointers in the second half and played tough max-effort defense to help close the gap, earning him a Hardhat.
Josh and Daniel’s pressure defense caused havoc, leading to steals and turnovers.

Challenges:

Turnovers were a major issue again, particularly in the first half.
LCC out-hustled SC for loose balls and offensive rebounds, which gave them extra possessions.
SC’s offense went cold in the second half, struggling to execute effectively.

Overall Takeaways

Stanstead College showed significant potential in all three games but was ultimately undone by a combination of mental lapses, unforced turnovers, and inconsistent offensive execution. Their defense was strong in each contest, but they struggled to maintain composure when the game was on the line. The team’s inability to finish at the rim, combined with a lack of focus at crucial moments, prevented them from securing victories.

To improve moving forward, SC will need to focus on mental discipline, better ball control, and developing consistency on offense. If they can address these issues and maintain the intensity on defense, they will have a solid foundation for future success.

Back